PERFORMANCE MEASURES
Computer Technology Department

 
 
 
 
Target Rating:

 

 

 Indicator is on target.

 Indicator is trailing,
need to watch closely.

 Indicator is not on target.

 Target not used for this data.


Function: Computer Technology
Performance Measure:    Amount of unscheduled downtown of all servers
Benchmark:  Keep unscheduled downtime of all servers at less than 1% of total possible uptime.
Benchmark Source:  Internal
   
2010 RESULTS: Goal of 1% was met in 2010

7 year trend:  

  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011 

Total possible uptime (days) 

 5110

5110 

5110 

5110 

5110 

5110 

5110 

Total downtime (days)

 .58

.51 

7.39 

.60 

.75 

.082 

.25 

Downtime as a % of uptime 

 .01%

.01% 

.14% 

.01% 

.01% 

.0% 

.0% 

7 year average - Downtime as a % of uptime  =

.026%

7 year average - Uptime %  =

99.974%

Analysis:

Calculation:  Downtime in server minutes divided by total possible uptime in server minutes.

   TARGET RATING
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Function: Computer Technology
Performance Measure:    Amount of unscheduled downtime of network links.
Benchmark:  Keep unscheduled downtime of all network links at less than 1% of total possible uptime.
Benchmark Source:  Internal
   
2010 RESULTS: Goal of 1% was met in 2010

7 year trend:  

  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011 

Total possible uptime (days) 

 7665

7665 

7665 

7665 

7665 

7665

7665 

Total downtime (days)

 1.23

22.45

4.87 

.25 

4.74

.59 

0 

Downtime as a % of uptime 

 .02%

.29% 

.06% 

.00% 

.06% 

.0% 

.0% 

7 year average - Downtime as a % of uptime  =

.061%

7 year average - Uptime %  =

99.939%

Analysis:

Calculation:  Downtime in network minutes divided by total possible uptime in network minutes.

   TARGET RATING
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Function: Computer Technology
Performance Measure:    Department expenditures
Benchmark:  Keep expenditures under budget.
Benchmark Source:  Internal
   
2010 RESULTS: Goal of keeping expeditures under budget was met in 2010.

7 year trend:  

 

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010 

2011

Budget

$1,507,022

$1,382,636

$1,322,579

$1,599,059

$1,502,203

$1,395,422

$1,383,987

Expenditures

$1,191,653

$1,002,921

$1,094,621

$1,131,314

$1,077,011

$1,023,902

$617,072

% of budget used

79.1%

72.5%

82.8%

70.7%

71.7%

73.4%

44.6%

7 year budget average  =

$1,441,844

6 year expenditures average =

$1,086,904

6 year % used average = 75%

Analysis:

Calculation:  Keep a detailed spreadsheet of every Computer Technology sub-C.I.P. purchase.

   TARGET RATING
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Function: Computer Technology
Performance Measure:    Meet with every director three times a year with CT satisfaction survey
Benchmark:  Score 8 or better on a scale from 1 to 10 on survey
Benchmark Source:  Internal
   
2009 RESULTS: N/A

7 year trend:  N/A

Analysis:

Calculation:  Tabulation of survey results.